For example, with regard to the medical review function, the solicitation directed each offeror to address its understanding of “jurisdiction-specific risk points.” Id. at 114 provided workload estimates for various requirements and gave directions to offerors regarding the content of their proposals and the criteria against which they would be evaluated. The solicitation required offerors to submit detailed management and staffing plans identified several performance requirements that are considered “mission-essential,” including the medical review function, id. The solicitation contemplates award of a cost-plus-award-fee contract for a 1‑year implementation/base period and six 1-year option periods provides that award will be made on a best-value tradeoff basis and establishes the following evaluation factors: technical approach, past performance, and cost/price. 75FCMC19R0002 to obtain Medicare benefit and claims administration services from a Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) for the geographic area identified as “Jurisdiction 6” (J6). In February 2019, the agency issued RFP No. WPS asserts that the agency’s bases for excluding WPS’s proposal were unreasonable and inconsistent with the provisions of the solicitation. Wisconsin Physicians Service Insurance Corporation (WPS), of Madison, Wisconsin, protests the decision by the Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, to exclude WPS’s proposal from further consideration under request for proposals (RFP) No. 75FCMC19R0002 for Medicare administration services.
0 kommentar(er)
